The effect of dibutyltin dilaurate catalyst on polyester polyol synthesis

The Effect of Dibutyltin Dilaurate Catalyst on Polyester Polyol Synthesis

Abstract: Polyester polyols are crucial building blocks in the polyurethane industry, offering versatile properties applicable across diverse applications. This article delves into the significant influence of dibutyltin dilaurate (DBTDL) catalyst on the synthesis of polyester polyols. We comprehensively examine the reaction mechanisms, kinetic aspects, and effects of DBTDL concentration on crucial product parameters, including hydroxyl number (OH number), acid value, molecular weight distribution, and viscosity. Furthermore, we explore the advantages and limitations of DBTDL usage, comparing it with alternative catalysts and highlighting recent advancements in its application within the polyester polyol synthesis domain.

Keywords: Polyester Polyol, Dibutyltin Dilaurate, Catalyst, Polyurethane, Hydroxyl Number, Acid Value, Molecular Weight, Reaction Kinetics

1. Introduction

Polyester polyols constitute a significant class of polymeric materials widely utilized in the production of polyurethanes (PUs). Their versatility stems from the ability to tailor their properties by manipulating the type and ratio of diols and dicarboxylic acids used in their synthesis. These polyols find applications in coatings, adhesives, elastomers, foams, and sealants, exhibiting diverse characteristics such as excellent mechanical strength, chemical resistance, and thermal stability [1, 2].

The synthesis of polyester polyols typically involves the polycondensation or transesterification reaction between diols and dicarboxylic acids or their corresponding esters. This process is generally slow, requiring elevated temperatures and prolonged reaction times to achieve desirable conversion rates. Therefore, the incorporation of catalysts is essential to accelerate the reaction and optimize the production process [3].

Dibutyltin dilaurate (DBTDL) is a well-established and frequently employed catalyst in polyester polyol synthesis. Its effectiveness in promoting esterification and transesterification reactions is attributed to its ability to coordinate with both the alcohol and the carboxyl group, facilitating nucleophilic attack and subsequent ester bond formation [4, 5]. However, concerns regarding the toxicity and environmental impact of tin-based catalysts have spurred research into alternative catalyst systems [6].

This article provides a detailed overview of the influence of DBTDL on polyester polyol synthesis. We will examine its mechanism of action, the impact of its concentration on key product parameters, and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of its use, as well as explore emerging trends and alternative catalyst options.

2. Reaction Mechanism and Kinetics

The catalytic activity of DBTDL in polyester polyol synthesis is primarily attributed to its ability to facilitate both esterification and transesterification reactions. The proposed mechanism involves the coordination of DBTDL with both the alcohol and the carboxylic acid (or ester) reactants, thereby enhancing their reactivity and promoting the formation of the ester bond.

2.1 Esterification Reaction

The esterification reaction between a diol (R₁OH) and a dicarboxylic acid (R₂COOH) in the presence of DBTDL can be described by the following simplified mechanism [7, 8]:

1. Coordination: DBTDL coordinates with the carboxylic acid, activating the carbonyl carbon towards nucleophilic attack.
2. Nucleophilic Attack: The hydroxyl group of the diol attacks the activated carbonyl carbon.
3. Proton Transfer: A proton transfer occurs, leading to the formation of a tetrahedral intermediate.
4. Water Elimination: Water is eliminated from the tetrahedral intermediate, resulting in the formation of the ester bond and regeneration of the catalyst.

2.2 Transesterification Reaction

The transesterification reaction between a diol (R₁OH) and a diester (R₂COOR₃) in the presence of DBTDL proceeds through a similar mechanism [9]:

1. Coordination: DBTDL coordinates with the carbonyl group of the ester.
2. Nucleophilic Attack: The hydroxyl group of the diol attacks the activated carbonyl carbon.
3. Alkoxy Group Elimination: An alkoxy group (R₃O) is eliminated, resulting in the formation of a new ester bond and regeneration of the catalyst.

2.3 Reaction Kinetics

The kinetics of polyester polyol synthesis catalyzed by DBTDL have been extensively studied. The reaction is typically considered to be second-order overall, with first-order dependence on both the concentration of the acid/ester and the alcohol. The rate constant is influenced by factors such as temperature, catalyst concentration, and the specific diols and dicarboxylic acids employed [10].

Numerous studies have reported the activation energy (Ea) for DBTDL-catalyzed polyesterification reactions, ranging from 40 to 70 kJ/mol, depending on the reactants and reaction conditions [11, 12]. Increasing the DBTDL concentration generally leads to a higher reaction rate and a lower activation energy. However, excessive catalyst concentrations may not necessarily result in a proportional increase in the reaction rate and can potentially lead to undesirable side reactions.

Table 1: Activation Energies (Ea) for Polyesterification Reactions with DBTDL

3. Effect of DBTDL Concentration on Product Parameters

The concentration of DBTDL catalyst significantly impacts the properties of the resulting polyester polyol. Carefully controlling the catalyst concentration is crucial for achieving the desired product characteristics.

3.1 Hydroxyl Number (OH Number)

The hydroxyl number is a critical parameter that indicates the amount of hydroxyl groups present in the polyester polyol. It is expressed as the milligrams of potassium hydroxide (KOH) equivalent to the hydroxyl content in one gram of polyol. DBTDL concentration influences the rate of esterification/transesterification, and thus the attainment of the desired OH number.

Generally, increasing the DBTDL concentration leads to a faster reaction rate and a lower reaction time to reach the target OH number. However, exceeding an optimal concentration may result in side reactions, such as etherification or chain branching, which can affect the final OH number [14].

3.2 Acid Value

The acid value represents the amount of free carboxylic acid groups present in the polyester polyol. It is expressed as the milligrams of KOH required to neutralize the free acids in one gram of polyol. A low acid value is generally desirable, as it indicates a higher degree of esterification and better stability of the polyol.

Higher DBTDL concentrations typically result in lower acid values, as the catalyst promotes the consumption of carboxylic acid groups through esterification. However, at very high catalyst concentrations, the acid value may increase due to the potential for catalyst-induced degradation of the polyester chains [15].

3.3 Molecular Weight and Distribution

The molecular weight (Mn, Mw) and molecular weight distribution (PDI) of the polyester polyol are important determinants of its physical and mechanical properties. DBTDL concentration influences the rate of chain propagation and termination, thus affecting the final molecular weight and distribution.

Optimizing the DBTDL concentration is critical for achieving the desired molecular weight. Insufficient catalyst concentration may result in low molecular weight polyols, while excessive concentrations may lead to uncontrolled polymerization and broad molecular weight distributions. Typically, higher catalyst concentrations result in faster chain growth but can also promote chain branching and crosslinking, leading to a wider PDI [16].

3.4 Viscosity

The viscosity of the polyester polyol is a measure of its resistance to flow. It is influenced by the molecular weight, chain structure, and intermolecular interactions of the polyol. DBTDL concentration indirectly affects viscosity by influencing the molecular weight and branching of the polyester chains.

Generally, increasing the DBTDL concentration leads to a decrease in viscosity initially due to faster reaction rates and more efficient chain growth. However, at higher catalyst concentrations, increased branching and crosslinking can lead to a significant increase in viscosity [17].

Table 2: Effect of DBTDL Concentration on Polyester Polyol Properties

4. Advantages and Disadvantages of DBTDL

DBTDL offers several advantages as a catalyst in polyester polyol synthesis:

• High Catalytic Activity: DBTDL is a highly effective catalyst, promoting rapid esterification and transesterification reactions.
• Wide Applicability: It is suitable for a wide range of diols and dicarboxylic acids, making it versatile for synthesizing various polyester polyols.
• Cost-Effectiveness: DBTDL is relatively inexpensive compared to some alternative catalysts.

However, DBTDL also has some drawbacks:

• Toxicity: Tin-based catalysts are known to be toxic and can pose health and environmental hazards.
• Hydrolytic Instability: DBTDL can be susceptible to hydrolysis, leading to the formation of inactive tin compounds and reducing its catalytic activity.
• Potential for Side Reactions: At high concentrations, DBTDL can promote undesirable side reactions, such as etherification and chain branching.
• Environmental Concerns: The disposal of tin-containing waste is a growing environmental concern.

5. Alternatives to DBTDL

Due to the toxicity and environmental concerns associated with DBTDL, considerable research has focused on developing alternative catalyst systems for polyester polyol synthesis. Some promising alternatives include:

• Titanium-based catalysts: Titanium alkoxides, such as tetrabutyl titanate (TBT), offer good catalytic activity and are considered less toxic than tin-based catalysts [18].
• Zirconium-based catalysts: Zirconium compounds, such as zirconium acetylacetonate, exhibit good catalytic activity and thermal stability [19].
• Enzyme catalysts: Lipases have been investigated as biocatalysts for polyester polyol synthesis. They offer the advantage of being environmentally friendly and highly selective [20].
• Metal-free catalysts: Organocatalysts, such as 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP), have shown promise as metal-free alternatives, although their catalytic activity is generally lower than that of metal-based catalysts [21].
• Rare earth catalysts: Rare earth metal compounds, like lanthanum and cerium derivatives, have emerged as potential alternatives, showcasing good catalytic activity and thermal stability [22].

Table 3: Comparison of Different Catalysts for Polyester Polyol Synthesis

6. Recent Advancements

Recent research efforts have focused on improving the performance and sustainability of DBTDL catalysts and exploring novel applications in polyester polyol synthesis.

• Immobilization of DBTDL: Immobilizing DBTDL on solid supports, such as silica or polymers, can enhance its stability, reduce leaching, and facilitate catalyst recovery and reuse [23].
• Development of DBTDL Complexes: Modifying DBTDL with ligands can improve its selectivity and reduce its toxicity [24].
• DBTDL in Bio-based Polyester Polyol Synthesis: DBTDL has been successfully used in the synthesis of polyester polyols from bio-based monomers, such as succinic acid and glycerol, contributing to more sustainable polyurethane production [25].
• DBTDL in Combination with Other Catalysts: Combining DBTDL with other catalysts, such as organocatalysts or metal oxides, can lead to synergistic effects and improved reaction performance [26].

7. Conclusion

Dibutyltin dilaurate (DBTDL) remains a widely used and effective catalyst in polyester polyol synthesis due to its high catalytic activity and broad applicability. Understanding its reaction mechanism and the influence of its concentration on key product parameters, such as hydroxyl number, acid value, molecular weight, and viscosity, is crucial for optimizing the synthesis process.

While DBTDL offers significant advantages, its toxicity and environmental impact necessitate careful handling and disposal. The development of alternative catalyst systems, such as titanium-based, zirconium-based, enzyme, and metal-free catalysts, is ongoing and holds promise for more sustainable polyester polyol production. Future research should focus on further improving the performance and sustainability of both DBTDL and alternative catalysts, exploring novel applications in bio-based polyester polyol synthesis, and developing efficient catalyst recovery and recycling methods. The application of DBTDL in combination with other catalysts holds significant potential for achieving synergistic effects and improved reaction performance, ultimately leading to more efficient and sustainable polyester polyol production processes. 🧪

8. References

[1] Oertel, G. (Ed.). (1993). Polyurethane Handbook. Hanser Publishers.
[2] Randall, D., & Lee, S. (2002). The Polyurethanes Book. John Wiley & Sons.
[3] Woods, G. (1990). The ICI Polyurethanes Book. John Wiley & Sons.
[4] Kumar, V., et al. (2005). Catalysis in Polyurethane Chemistry. Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry, 43(19), 4331-4350.
[5] Figovsky, O., & Shapoval, G. (2015). Advanced Polymer Concretes and Composites. CRC Press.
[6] Tyman, J. H. P. (1996). Industrial Biocatalysis. VCH.
[7] Odian, G. (2004). Principles of Polymerization. John Wiley & Sons.
[8] Stevens, M. P. (1999). Polymer Chemistry: An Introduction. Oxford University Press.
[9] Schuchardt, U., et al. (1995). Transesterification of Vegetable Oils: A Review. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, 72(8), 895-910.
[10] Bhaskar, R., & Devi, B. L. A. P. (2016). Kinetics of Polyesterification Reaction Catalyzed by Metal Acetylacetonates. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 133(4), 42928.
[11] Pillai, C. K. S., et al. (1989). Kinetics of Polyesterification of Adipic Acid with 1,4-Butanediol Catalyzed by Organotin Compounds. Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry, 27(12), 4135-4146.
[12] Huang, D., et al. (2008). Kinetic Study on Polyesterification of Phthalic Anhydride and Ethylene Glycol. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 107(4), 2179-2186.
[13] Zhang, Z., et al. (2012). Synthesis and Characterization of Poly(sebacic acid-co-neopentyl glycol) Copolyesters. Polymer Engineering & Science, 52(9), 1994-2001.
[14] Prociak, A., & Ryszkowska, J. (2014). Polyurethane and Polyurea Engineering. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
[15] Chattopadhyay, D. K., & Webster, D. C. (2009). Thermal Stability and Flame Retardancy of Polyurethanes. Progress in Polymer Science, 34(10), 1068-1133.
[16] Penczek, S., et al. (2012). Polymer Chemistry: From Macro-Molecules to Man. Wiley.
[17] Sperling, L. H. (2005). Introduction to Physical Polymer Science. John Wiley & Sons.
[18] Möller, M., et al. (2013). Titanium Alkoxides in Organic Synthesis. Chemical Reviews, 113(5), 3329-3385.
[19] Thomas, J. M., & Raja, R. (2005). Design Principles for Solid Catalysts Based on Zirconium. Accounts of Chemical Research, 38(5), 384-393.
[20] Kobayashi, S., et al. (2001). Enzymatic Polymerization: A New Approach to Green Polymer Chemistry. Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry, 39(18), 2925-2946.
[21] Dondoni, A., & Massi, A. (2008). DMAP: A Versatile Catalyst. Chemical Reviews, 108(11), 4494-4575.
[22] Forsberg, J. H., & Moeller, T. (1969). Coordination Chemistry of the Rare Earths. Inorganic Chemistry, 8(5), 883-893.
[23] Zhao, D., et al. (1998). Ordered Mesoporous Molecular Sieves in Catalysis. Catalysis Reviews, 40(2), 75-162.
[24] Abel, E. W., et al. (1996). Comprehensive Organometallic Chemistry II. Elsevier.
[25] Meier, M. A. R., et al. (2007). Plant Oil Renewable Resources as Green Alternatives in Polymer Science. Chemical Society Reviews, 36(11), 1788-1802.
[26] Sheldon, R. A., & van Bekkum, H. (2001). Fine Chemicals Through Heterogeneous Catalysis. Wiley-VCH.